EliteKiller wrote:Corbyn is a principled consistent individual, to claim he's a threat to National security is massive overreach. He has always sat down with terrorists / freedom fighters take your pick, but there's never been any evidence he's disclosed sensitive information. His failing is that he's a weak and ineffective Leader, and yes these two things are linked. When you see yourself as an arbitrator then you can't have or display favoritism to one side or the other, remaining impartial is the key skill in arbitration. However remaining impartial in politics is called sitting-on-the-fence whilst in some areas Corbyn is very clear, mostly social issues, in other major political matters very notably Brexit he's about as clear as West Country cider ...
His inability to focus the Labour party in major policy areas is why their support is collapsing - not entirely his fault, he was rejected as a Leader by 75% of the MP's who know how politics work - Momentum and the Unions saw him nominated with the rank and following their lead, that was a huge mistake and Labour have suffered for it ... if Harold Wilson had been around today he have wiped the floor with May / Boris or any other Tory leader.
He's a threat to national security, because he's naive and too trusting. He might not willingly disclose information, but you can bet that he'd leak any information that showed us in a bad light