Clubs Interested In Bendtner

[Popey]

nic has the quality but he should have more chances to play as striker in a 4-4-2

[GunnGunn]

nic has the quality but he should have more chances to play as striker in a 4-4-2

Agreed.

[Est83]

The only player I can think of that benefits form the 4-3-3 is Theo, and he's proabably ready for the striker role in a 2 striker formation now anyway. Everyone, and I mean everyone, from the fullbacks, to Arshavin, Song, every striker and every so-called wide midfielder, would be better in the 4-1-3-2.

[liam_cork]

but its simple we aint going to be playing 442

[liam_cork]

i'd loan him

[GunnGunn]

And until AW realises that the 4-3-3 doesn't work that well against teams who can play the game, we will always fall short.

Chamakh and especially Bendtner are good strikers.

Solution = Next time RvP gets crocked, sell him and play them two up front.

Simples.

[liam_cork]

if rvp goes he needs to buy top class, i dont agree with bendy hasn't got chances he's just not good enough yet. he can be but he's not there at the moment

[GunnGunn]

It makes perfect sense to sell a striker who can only play for half a season at a time, lets hope he doesn't get another big injury otherwise its curtains IMO.

Cham and Bendy might not be as good as RvP but we have all seen how many goals they can score when on form, and how good they both are in the air.

[liam_cork]

i agree rvp should be shown the door, but not to a prem side. but theres obviously an issue between cham and AW and bendy aint there yet so we would need another top top striker

[GunnGunn]

AW won't buy a top top striker.

To buy a striker of RvP's calibre who will stay fit, hell is there even another striker in the World that exists who is that player?

I haven't seen him.

[gzagee]

AW won't buy a top top striker.

To buy a striker of RvP's calibre who will stay fit, hell is there even another striker in the World that exists who is that player?

I haven't seen him.

And you'd rather we sold the only player of that mould, should he suffer another injury.
Makes perfect sense.

[StLGooner]

We need another striker as good as RvP or better imo, if we want to be successful. Nick and Cham aren't good enough to cover for RvP all the time, someone with their talent or lack of should be our 3rd or 4th choice striker, not our 2nd.

[GunnGunn]

AW won't buy a top top striker.

To buy a striker of RvP's calibre who will stay fit, hell is there even another striker in the World that exists who is that player?

I haven't seen him.

And you'd rather we sold the only player of that mould, should he suffer another injury.
Makes perfect sense.

It does make perfect sense when that player becomes detrimental to this team.

Or should i quote the team cycle of what happens when RvP gets injured and comes back for umpteenth time?

[gzagee]

AW won't buy a top top striker.

To buy a striker of RvP's calibre who will stay fit, hell is there even another striker in the World that exists who is that player?

I haven't seen him.

And you'd rather we sold the only player of that mould, should he suffer another injury.
Makes perfect sense.

It does make perfect sense when that player becomes detrimental to this team.

Or should i quote the team cycle of what happens when RvP gets injured and comes back for umpteenth time?

And Bendtner hasn't also had his fair share of injuries??
Look, we don't sell our best striker because he spends 3weeks/a month out. Especially if the back-up options aren't that good.
Even combined Chamakh/Bendtner aren't very mobile (i.e. they don't know how to lose their marker) and sure as hell don't have the propensity to do the extraordinary on a regular basis.
Both could play alongside RvP or Walcott but, in tandem they are not dynamic.
If you sell RvP then you buy someone of top quality.

[GunnGunn]

AW won't buy a top top striker.

To buy a striker of RvP's calibre who will stay fit, hell is there even another striker in the World that exists who is that player?

I haven't seen him.

And you'd rather we sold the only player of that mould, should he suffer another injury.
Makes perfect sense.

It does make perfect sense when that player becomes detrimental to this team.

Or should i quote the team cycle of what happens when RvP gets injured and comes back for umpteenth time?

And Bendtner hasn't also had his fair share of injuries??
Look, we don't sell our best striker because he spends 3weeks/a month out. Especially if the back-up options aren't that good.
Even combined Chamakh/Bendtner aren't very mobile (i.e. they don't know how to lose their marker) and sure as hell don't have the propensity to do the extraordinary on a regular basis.
Both could play alongside RvP or Walcott but, in tandem they are not dynamic.
If you sell RvP then you buy someone of top quality.

3 weeks or a month? This is a player who is regularly our for more than half a season at time.

Not saying he should be sold now, but one big injury, and who can't see it, and he should go.

As for not being able to lose their marker, Chamakh i agree, but Bendtner is very rarely if ever marked out of a game, its arguably his strongest attribute i.e. Ghosting into the box, he is very rarely picked up.

And we will never know how good they are if they don't play, or at least play in their proper positions.

Walcott - Bendtner would be a great parternship IMO.

Even if RvP was sold, AW wouldn't bring in anyone near as quality, he would probably put Vela up front.