UFGN wrote:DiamondGooner wrote:Phil71 wrote:If I was to make the decision I'd give strong advice to those who might be deemed vulnerable to isolate themselves, and I'd let everyone else do what they like.
We can't be locking down 20,000 people to save one life. Too many people's jobs and income are at stake.
That's what I'm saying.
Its not saying F U to the elderly and vulnerable, its saying if your not safe then stay in and be safe.
Same advice as you'd give to someone with asthma about smoking, don't do what can clearly harm you.
As stated the rest of us still have mortgages / rent to pay and the world is still turning.
But....
That only really works for vulnerable people who live alone. Most do not live alone, and if the people they live with are not locked down then they are at the same risk as if they were out and about themselves
I would suggest offering to pay hotel bills for vulnerable people so they can self isolate. Block book every bloody travelodge and similar in the country. Pay the hotel £40 pppn, thats £1200 a month. Expensive, but much cheaper than furlough and we can get the economy back up
People can take precautions at home. Clean everything twice a day with anti bac. Wash your hands and put alcohol gel on them all day. Wear masks even. Have the vulnerable isolate in a bedroom.
What we can't afford to do is lock the country down again.