https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53886070
It's happening again.
by Ach » Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:18 am
by Phil71 » Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:28 am
Ach wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53886070
It's happening again.
In a public safety alert, police urged 24-hour businesses to consider closing because of "numerous" calls about armed robberies and shots being fired.
by Royal Gooner » Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:18 pm
Ach wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53886070
It's happening again.
by DiamondGooner » Mon Aug 24, 2020 6:31 pm
Royal Gooner wrote:Ach wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53886070
It's happening again.
That's the problem with Yank cops, they shoot first and ask questions later.
by Phil71 » Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:00 am
DiamondGooner wrote:Royal Gooner wrote:Ach wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53886070
It's happening again.
That's the problem with Yank cops, they shoot first and ask questions later.
Its a two way street.
Yes American cops are way over aggressive but I've also seen videos where guys reach back into their car then pop up guns blazing at officers.
Fact is this, Americans need to realise your police are armed and are trained (or lack of) to deal with an "armed" populace, is it really worth not complying?
The amount of videos I could show from this year alone of in particular African Americans fighting back against officers, not complying then getting shot etc is ridiculous.
Don't get me wrong there are some which are just out and out manslaughter but a lot that I've seen are people not complying .......... why do it?
Its ok for us in the UK because our police don't have guns, the worst we'll get is manhandled or tazed, you guys deal with guns drawn on you ......... stop being fkin stupid.
by Nuggets » Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:28 am
Phil71 wrote:DiamondGooner wrote:Royal Gooner wrote:Ach wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53886070
It's happening again.
That's the problem with Yank cops, they shoot first and ask questions later.
Its a two way street.
Yes American cops are way over aggressive but I've also seen videos where guys reach back into their car then pop up guns blazing at officers.
Fact is this, Americans need to realise your police are armed and are trained (or lack of) to deal with an "armed" populace, is it really worth not complying?
The amount of videos I could show from this year alone of in particular African Americans fighting back against officers, not complying then getting shot etc is ridiculous.
Don't get me wrong there are some which are just out and out manslaughter but a lot that I've seen are people not complying .......... why do it?
Its ok for us in the UK because our police don't have guns, the worst we'll get is manhandled or tazed, you guys deal with guns drawn on you ......... stop being fkin stupid.
Yep.
You either have a death wish or you don't understand the gravity of the situation when you have armed police with a reputation for shooting people giving you instructions. It really is one of the most dangerous situations you will find yourself in, and you have to get your brain in gear.
If it was me I'd be yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir, whatever you say sir.
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Wed Aug 26, 2020 4:36 pm
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Wed Aug 26, 2020 4:40 pm
Royal Gooner wrote:Ach wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53886070
It's happening again.
That's the problem with Yank cops, they shoot first and ask questions later.
by LMAO » Wed Aug 26, 2020 5:35 pm
Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:The police are the responsibility of local governments, not the Feds. If there is someone to blame beyond the perps or suspects then it must be those in charge of "systemically" racist police forces right? Why do the generationational liberal politicians who are charged with running police forces get a pass? Given human nature and the current repercussions no cop goes to work deciding he or she is going to hunt down a black man to kill. But if they feel their life is in danger that puts a whole other light on each situation.
by DiamondGooner » Wed Aug 26, 2020 6:04 pm
LMAO wrote:Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:The police are the responsibility of local governments, not the Feds. If there is someone to blame beyond the perps or suspects then it must be those in charge of "systemically" racist police forces right? Why do the generationational liberal politicians who are charged with running police forces get a pass? Given human nature and the current repercussions no cop goes to work deciding he or she is going to hunt down a black man to kill. But if they feel their life is in danger that puts a whole other light on each situation.
That's only half of the equation.
For example with local politicians, Kenosha leaders unanimously endorsed body cams back in 2017 but dragged their feet on implementation because of costs (the 2022 budget allows for body cams now), and everyone who stalled should be voted out. Because of their lack of foresight, Kenosha residents are now going to foot the bill for a man's entire life instead of just paying a fixed cost back in 2018 that could've prevented this shitstorm. Although, the videos from his neighbors may get Kenosha residents off the hook because I—and most other people—probably would've shot if I were a policeman in that situation and wouldn't see it as racially motivated (I'd do it no matter if it was a white, black, brown, yellow, or purple polka dotted person).
But the other half is police unions having too much power. How is a local politician supposed to stand up to police unions when the unions will just hit back on the politician and fund their opponent who is more 'police-friendly' (i.e., willing to suck up to police unions) to oust them out of office, or get hit with the blue flu from the police union causing crime rates to increase?
I think solving the second half will go toward fixing the first half.
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Wed Aug 26, 2020 8:16 pm
LMAO wrote:Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:The police are the responsibility of local governments, not the Feds. If there is someone to blame beyond the perps or suspects then it must be those in charge of "systemically" racist police forces right? Why do the generationational liberal politicians who are charged with running police forces get a pass? Given human nature and the current repercussions no cop goes to work deciding he or she is going to hunt down a black man to kill. But if they feel their life is in danger that puts a whole other light on each situation.
That's only half of the equation.
For example with local politicians, Kenosha leaders unanimously endorsed body cams back in 2017 but dragged their feet on implementation because of costs (the 2022 budget allows for body cams now), and everyone who stalled should be voted out. Because of their lack of foresight, Kenosha residents are now going to foot the bill for a man's entire life instead of just paying a fixed cost back in 2018 that could've prevented this shitstorm. Although, the videos from his neighbors may get Kenosha residents off the hook because I—and most other people—probably would've shot if I were a policeman in that situation and wouldn't see it as racially motivated (I'd do it no matter if it was a white, black, brown, yellow, or purple polka dotted person).
But the other half is police unions having too much power. How is a local politician supposed to stand up to police unions when the unions will just hit back on the politician and fund their opponent who is more 'police-friendly' (i.e., willing to suck up to police unions) to oust them out of office, or get hit with the blue flu from the police union causing crime rates to increase?
I think solving the second half will go toward fixing the first half.
by DiamondGooner » Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:48 pm
by DiamondGooner » Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:51 pm
by LMAO » Thu Aug 27, 2020 1:15 am
Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:LMAO wrote:Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:The police are the responsibility of local governments, not the Feds. If there is someone to blame beyond the perps or suspects then it must be those in charge of "systemically" racist police forces right? Why do the generationational liberal politicians who are charged with running police forces get a pass? Given human nature and the current repercussions no cop goes to work deciding he or she is going to hunt down a black man to kill. But if they feel their life is in danger that puts a whole other light on each situation.
That's only half of the equation.
For example with local politicians, Kenosha leaders unanimously endorsed body cams back in 2017 but dragged their feet on implementation because of costs (the 2022 budget allows for body cams now), and everyone who stalled should be voted out. Because of their lack of foresight, Kenosha residents are now going to foot the bill for a man's entire life instead of just paying a fixed cost back in 2018 that could've prevented this shitstorm. Although, the videos from his neighbors may get Kenosha residents off the hook because I—and most other people—probably would've shot if I were a policeman in that situation and wouldn't see it as racially motivated (I'd do it no matter if it was a white, black, brown, yellow, or purple polka dotted person).
But the other half is police unions having too much power. How is a local politician supposed to stand up to police unions when the unions will just hit back on the politician and fund their opponent who is more 'police-friendly' (i.e., willing to suck up to police unions) to oust them out of office, or get hit with the blue flu from the police union causing crime rates to increase?
I think solving the second half will go toward fixing the first half.
Those two halves do not fully add up. The far greater issue is crime and why black communities do have far higher crime rates. A major part of that question IS the decline in the nuclear family and that can be traced right back to 1962. BLM is against the nuclear family as per their website agenda. At some point the communities need to simply come down hard on criminals rather than screaming racist over and over. But then that is what we have heard for three years plus now about everything so that has to be factored in. Make that nine years plus because Obama/Holder did the same time after time.
As for police unions, and all public service sector unions and teachers unions, they all need to go. CA and Illinois are both in a world of hurt financially because those unions contribute to politicians who then support untenable pensions etc. Your concern about influencing politicians is across the board and is a huge issue in Conservative circles. The Dem party was all about police unions until very recently because they represented their membership too well. In Florida the teachers unions sued to get school shut back down this week. The response by the union rep was to say Trump was behind the local decisions. To pretend that government employee unions are not political is refusing to accept reality.
But given the big push for body cams since Ferguson to protect both cops and suspects it is quite amazing that these cities have not done so despite several Federal programs in the past few years to fund them. In this case body cams would not show much IMO given all the cell phones that were out.
I really wish they would say if the man was reaching for a gun or not. The cop obviously thought so but are they scared that if there was not the rioters would really starting burning shit down or if there was would they just continue burning shit down?
The Kenosha government is not going to be voted out given the city votes overwhelmingly Dem. Even if individuals are, another liberal will replace them.
by VCC » Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:44 am