Jedi wrote:LMAO wrote:Sims wrote:Obvs a fan of progressive rights in the LGBQT community but there’s no chance id get with a bird who used to be a fella
Don’t think there’s anything wrong with that opinion tbh
First sentence: Yep.
Hell, I'll even go as far as saying some traps look better than some women, but that doesn't mean I'm sexually attracted to them. Everyone has their tastes, it's just not mine.
I know this is going to be a very unpopular opinion, but I actually don't understand this. Like, if you grant me that some trannies look better than women, how do you justify not being attracted to them (fully clothed)? Or are you saying that they're more attractive than some women but that they will never be able to reach the authenticity of a very attractive "real" woman for you to be sexually attracted to them?
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with not being attracted to trannies on it's own, as long as you've established why you're not attracted to them. Imagine this hypothetical. There is a tranny who has incredibly feminine features (voice included) and on the surface looks very attractive. Next to them is a woman who is still attractive but on the surface simply less attractive than her. You can pick one to give you a BJ fully clothed (again fully clothed so we avoid the penis argument). Which one do you pick? If you pick the woman It's going to be kind of hard for you to justify it without admitting that you're uncomfortable/uneasy with trans people, which is a stance you're allowed to take, but you can't say you're fine with LGBT people in the next sentence.
This whole argument falls apart if you have a religious worldview but then you're kind of automatically anti-LGBT to an extent.
............... you've thought about this a lot haven't you lol.
Look fact is this, you can all act all "progressive" and all that BS but the fact is this, if you fk a tranny, its a guy ........... simple as that.
Don't let technology fool you, if we didn't have the boob implants and the hormone replacements etc what would we have then? no trannies right? i mean yeah you'll have feminine homosexuals wearing a wig ..........like they did old school sure, but not proper trannies right?
Its a bloke, fk all this "modern" agenda BS, too many guys these days are getting sucked into this millennial thinking, the reason you don't fancy tranny's is because it would be gay to do so.
Bodies telling you no, political correctness is telling you yes.
Go fk themselves, I'm a straight male, and I'm not fkin apologising for it, sick of this guilt trip nonsense.