In the news today...

[DiamondGooner]

This is appalling and wrong. The woman clearly wouldn't have had sex with the officer if she had known who he was

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46570224

Sinister, chilling and morally corrupt

................ yeah but, get over it.

Men and women lie in relationships every fkin day, we're going to literally end up taking each other to court for being human next.

I do feel some sympathy for the woman, but that's like taking your husband to court if you catch him cheating etc, that's a lie right?

I'm glad the court saw sense, you start upholding charges like this and it erodes are freedoms in general.

[UFGN]

This is appalling and wrong. The woman clearly wouldn't have had sex with the officer if she had known who he was

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46570224

Sinister, chilling and morally corrupt

................ yeah but, get over it.

Men and women lie in relationships every fkin day, we're going to literally end up taking each other to court for being human next.

I do feel some sympathy for the woman, but that's like taking your husband to court if you catch him cheating etc, that's a lie right?

I'm glad the court saw sense, you start upholding charges like this and it erodes are freedoms in general.

It's absolutely nothing like a normal lie within a relationship

She was targeted by the police and the police officer used sex as a tactic to win her trust and get information out of her. They were never in a relationship, the whole thing was a manipulation by the the police.

It's disgusting.

How can you talk about freedom? This is a gross breach of civil rights

[Phil71]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

[UFGN]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

[Phil71]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

[UFGN]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

It's a scary world in your head

How would you like it if it happened to your sister, mother etc? They had it coming right?

No?

[Phil71]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

It's a scary world in your head

How would you like it if it happened to your sister, mother etc? They had it coming right?

No?

Anyone involved with these disruptive, anarchistic organisations is fair game for deep undercover operations such as what happened in this case.

[UFGN]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

It's a scary world in your head

How would you like it if it happened to your sister, mother etc? They had it coming right?

No?

Anyone involved with these disruptive, anarchistic organisations is fair game for deep undercover operations such as what happened in this case.

Ok so you're cool with a woman being sexually abused to prevent a few protests

You're a really nasty peace of work

[Phil71]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

It's a scary world in your head

How would you like it if it happened to your sister, mother etc? They had it coming right?

No?

Anyone involved with these disruptive, anarchistic organisations is fair game for deep undercover operations such as what happened in this case.

Ok so you're cool with a woman being sexually abused to prevent a few protests

You're a really nasty peace of work

Don’t be silly now.

She was in a willing sexual relationship with him. There was no sexual abuse. She wasn’t forced to do anything.

[starmandb]

Stacey Dooley wins strictly
Glad when the people spoke they were listened to this time

[UFGN]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

It's a scary world in your head

How would you like it if it happened to your sister, mother etc? They had it coming right?

No?

Anyone involved with these disruptive, anarchistic organisations is fair game for deep undercover operations such as what happened in this case.

Ok so you're cool with a woman being sexually abused to prevent a few protests

You're a really nasty peace of work

Don’t be silly now.

She was in a willing sexual relationship with him. There was no sexual abuse. She wasn’t forced to do anything.

It's amazing the standards that some people have

I'm honestly shocked that anyone would defend this scumbag or the circumstances

[Phil71]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

It's a scary world in your head

How would you like it if it happened to your sister, mother etc? They had it coming right?

No?

Anyone involved with these disruptive, anarchistic organisations is fair game for deep undercover operations such as what happened in this case.

Ok so you're cool with a woman being sexually abused to prevent a few protests

You're a really nasty peace of work

Don’t be silly now.

She was in a willing sexual relationship with him. There was no sexual abuse. She wasn’t forced to do anything.

It's amazing the standards that some people have

I'm honestly shocked that anyone would defend this scumbag or the circumstances

Ah well. I’m sure you’ll get over it.

[DiamondGooner]

If you get deeply involved in disruptive, anarchist organisations, the police should be able to use any tactics to stop your activities.

The court decision is correct.

That right there is literally the statement of a fascist

Before you disagree, read it back and have a little think

People who want the police to work to protect law & order are fascists?

You sound like Rick from The Young Ones.

It's a scary world in your head

How would you like it if it happened to your sister, mother etc? They had it coming right?

No?

Anyone involved with these disruptive, anarchistic organisations is fair game for deep undercover operations such as what happened in this case.

Ok so you're cool with a woman being sexually abused to prevent a few protests

You're a really nasty peace of work

Don’t be silly now.

She was in a willing sexual relationship with him. There was no sexual abuse. She wasn’t forced to do anything.

It's amazing the standards that some people have

I'm honestly shocked that anyone would defend this scumbag or the circumstances

In agreement with Phil on this one.

What a load of bollocks for thinking you can press charges on a man for consensual sex, how do you know she didn't initiate it?

No one "targeted" her, the police put a mole in their camp and he developed a relationship with a member, whether it was just for sex or to fit in more, it doesn't matter, it was consensual.

His identity doesn't mean anything, men lie about their age, their wealth all sorts to bed a woman and as low as I find that, low, is not illegal.

Grow up and stop meandering in this victim mentality, more serious injustices happen around the world daily, some anarchist lady getting her rocks off with a copper is not one of them.

[Va-Va-Voom]

Regardless, it's still disturbing that Phil thinks police should be allowed to do whatever they want to achieve their goals.

Not talking about this instance specifically, but that is an extremely slippery slope that knows no end.

[Rockape]

I’m enjoying SPOTY tonight, you forget how much amazing sport we’ve seen this year! Anyone else watching and voting?

I just voted for Dinah Asher-Smith. What an amazing year she had!