LMAO wrote:jayramfootball wrote:DiamondGooner wrote:jayramfootball wrote:The point was simple.
The difference is that many Islamic terrorist groups are committing acts of terrorism in the name of the religion.
None of the others you mentioned were/are.
Consider your point defeated.
At this point you'd be wise to STFU yourself, but alas, that will be too much for you.
............... and if I said I was Santa Claus does that make it so you fkin wet wipe!!
You can't act in the name of a religion when none of the leaders of the religion havent ordered these acts can you.
If the Pope hasn't ordered a war then how can you claim its a war for Christianity?
If you can't understand something so simple then get the fk out of the subject.
Like I said, all pretty simple.
If you commit an act of terror in the name of your religion you are indeed a religious terrorist - in the latest case an islamic terrorist.
Your own argument pulls you to pieces.
The KKK are called White Supremicists - because that is EXACTLY what they are. That is what they are fighting for.
That does not mean they carry out their acts ON BEHALF of all white people.
Consider your argument doubly defeated.... unless of course you'd like to make an argument that it is wrong to call the KKK white supremacists?
tbf the KKK and other white supremacist groups invoke Christianity—derived from their interpretations of the Bible—to justify white supremacy. So, still rooted in religion, even though it's likely a veil, just like Daesh, Al-Qaeda, and the Taliban do.
I rather think the KKK would reject black Christians, don't you?
That said, I'd have no problem referring to them as White Christian terrorists, though - if someone wanted to do that. I would not assume they speak for all Christians or all white people. Just as I would not assume an islamic terrorist speaks for all Muslims.