DiamondGooner wrote:............... you've thought about this a lot haven't you lol.
Look fact is this, you can all act all "progressive" and all that BS but the fact is this, if you fk a tranny, its a guy ........... simple as that.
Don't let technology fool you, if we didn't have the boob implants and the hormone replacements etc what would we have then? no trannies right? i mean yeah you'll have feminine homosexuals wearing a wig ..........like they did old school sure, but not proper trannies right?
Its a bloke, fk all this "modern" agenda BS, too many guys these days are getting sucked into this millennial thinking, the reason you don't fancy tranny's is because it would be gay to do so.
Bodies telling you no, political correctness is telling you yes.
Go fk themselves, I'm a straight male, and I'm not fkin apologising for it, sick of this guilt trip nonsense.
Yes i have thought about this a lot. I've recently debated someone on this exact same topic and I've done quite a bit of research so I'm pretty confident I'm right.
A tranny is definitely of male sex, but it's not a "guy" depending on which working definition of gender you choose. Sex already covers reproductive function and the XY sex determination chromosomes so If you define gender as google does: "the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones)" you have to agree that it's unfair to label trannies as men. On the other hand, if you define gender as a complete synonym for sex that's just pointless. Most of the issues people have with grasping concepts like these is that they're sadly usually presented by screeching Tumblr morons.
Also asking what would happen if we didn't have plastic surgery and hormone blocking therapy is ridiculous to me because we do have these things, and the science is only getting better, and it's going to reach a point where you won't be able to tell a difference between any tranny and any female, so you should question yourself how you're going to justify branding them as "guys" when you literally won't be able to tell the difference in the near future.
I also disagree with the notion that I'm "sucked into modern millennial thinking". I actually live in a VERY conservative country and i used to be extremely homophobic (i genuinely hated gay people) as this was the society i was brought up in. Most of the opinions i have acquired since then have been through rigorous research, not societal pressures to conform to an agenda.
the reason you don't fancy tranny's is because it would be gay to do so.
Actually, according to a study from 2015 this is completely wrong
In this study there were three groups of participants. The first group consisted of men who identify as homosexual, the second of men who identify as heterosexual, and the third of Gynandromorphophilic men (men who are attracted to trannies). They were shown 3 minute erotic clips and asked to self measure their own sexual arousal. All the while, they had a strain gauge around their penises which measured changes in their physical arousal.
The data collected this way was analyzed and when we have two diagrams that sum up the findings.
It seems pretty clear that Gynandromorphophilic men have an attraction very different their homosexual counterparts. While they've shown more or less equal high level of arousal to women and trannies, their arousal level drops off dramatically when shown gay porn.
On the other hand, surprisingly or not so surprisingly, heterosexual men show a higher level of arousal to tranny porn than homosexual men.
Citations:
https://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/s10508-016-0872-6 and
https://sci-hub.tw/10.1017/S0033291715002317Conclusion: TRAPS AREN'T GAY!