Pudpop wrote:She is hyperandrogenous, not intersex whatever the f**k that's supposed to mean. She also isn't the first athlete that is hyperandrogenous but she's the first to be treated as if she isn't a woman and it's got everything to do with how she looks, and nothing to do with any bullshit reason you read about in the Mail.
Calling her a man is hate speech and pathetic.
That is true, and while it may be unfair, she will obviously draw more attention to the issue because she does look masculine. I've been reading about it and the IAAF only started regulating hyperandrogenism after she burst onto the scene. The entire debate basically started with and revolves solely around her.
You're getting way too hung up on me calling her a man though, it was just a throwaway comment - not "hate speech".