Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:08 pm
Hall of Famer in my opinion. Had the pleasure of having him on my fantasy team for like 5 separate years too. Thanks Drew!!
Arsenal Website and Forum
https://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/
https://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25450
Va-Va-Voom wrote:Wtf is a BOAT?
LMAO wrote:Breesus will be an undisputed first ballot HOFer.
Even without my team bias, he's the BOAT QB. If he had the defenses Brady and Manning got to enjoy, then he would've had a few more rings imo
Also, sucks what's happened with the Rams. Almost as soon as they move back to LA, they become one of, if not the, best team in the NFL (kinda like the Browns moving to Baltimore and becoming the Ravens). Idk if things would've played out the same if they stayed in St. Louis, but it's still really shitty. Sorry bro
LMAO wrote:Breesus will be an undisputed first ballot HOFer.
Even without my team bias, he's the BOAT QB. If he had the defenses Brady and Manning got to enjoy, then he would've had a few more rings imo
Also, sucks what's happened with the Rams. Almost as soon as they move back to LA, they become one of, if not the, best team in the NFL (kinda like the Browns moving to Baltimore and becoming the Ravens). Idk if things would've played out the same if they stayed in St. Louis, but it's still really shitty. Sorry bro
Santi wrote:LMAO wrote:Breesus will be an undisputed first ballot HOFer.
Even without my team bias, he's the BOAT QB. If he had the defenses Brady and Manning got to enjoy, then he would've had a few more rings imo
Also, sucks what's happened with the Rams. Almost as soon as they move back to LA, they become one of, if not the, best team in the NFL (kinda like the Browns moving to Baltimore and becoming the Ravens). Idk if things would've played out the same if they stayed in St. Louis, but it's still really shitty. Sorry bro
Was trying to work out last night where I'd put him, every time I thought I'd decided I thought of someone new.
Think he's top 5 all time, just on pure records if nothing else, needs at least 1 more ring to be truly up there.
Va-Va-Voom wrote:Wtf is a BOAT?
Santi wrote:Hey, I get your point and to an extent I agree but I'd argue that the very very best are capable of dragging teams all the way. Now it is slightly unfair to expect a QB to drag a sack of shit to a superbowl but Brees hasn't exactly played for the Browns for 15 years and only has 1 ring.
If you were to pick a QB for a clutch playoff match who would you pick, Brady, Manning, Favre, Brees, Marino, Elway, Rodgers or someone else? That's how I think of it more than the fact he hasn't won multiple rings, I just take that as a symptom.
Also, the onus is on him to put himself in a team capable of winning a SB, he's good enough to have his pick of teams.
Va-Va-Voom wrote:Rings aside, Brady was always more clutch than Manning.
StLGooner wrote:I hear ya. But specifically in football, it's so hard to go by that. Brees could have done everything he could do, and drove his offense down the field and scored every time. But if his defense doesn't stop them every time, then they don't win. So by no fault of is own, he doesn't win a championship. He couldn't have dragged his team all the way cause he doesn't play defense. So see what I mean?
People will always think Brady was a better QB cause of all the rings he has. But I personally think Manning was better, and Favre, but it won't go down in history like that. Brady was just fortunate to have great teams and great coaches, not that he still isn't good, but because of what he won he'll always be labeled as better and that isn't right imo.