Marsbar100 wrote:Prefer to be nadal with Olympic gold medals though
No you wouldn't. You just like Nadal more.
Nobody in the world mentioned the Olympics as a factor until Djokovic started threatening the grand slam record. No prize, no ranking points, best of 3 set matches. It's about as big as winning an ATP 1000 Master title, slightly more because it's every 4 years.
How many times do I need to do this?
Most ATP 1000 Masters (won all of them at least twice, while nobody else is one away from winning them all once):

Nadal 6/9
Federer 7/9
Djokovic 9/9 x2^ This is bigger than the slam record in my book. There's no one in the history of Tennis who's done anything similar, and no one is close to touching this record.
But, don't worry, we have the
slam record in the bag too:

"Most slams" is another narrative created by Fedal fans around 2015 or so, when it looked like Djokovic didn't have a chance to catch up, but he started prioritizing them, and he did it. Tough luck.
Ok, but is he really number 1? Well, he also happens to have the record for most weeks spent as no.1 player in the world:

Fine, but Arsenal was number 1 in December too. How many season has he finished as the no. 1 player in the world?

He has the record there too.
What about the ATP Finals event—where the Top 8 players in the world meet for the final tournament of the season? Another Djokovic record:

Federer put up a good fight, but Nadal is not responsive. Zero.
Oh, Djokovic also has the edge when it comes to H2H records against Nadal and Federer.
It's over. Stop it. Love your Tennis legends, but don't put them in the same category as Djokovic. They're not.