AFC10 wrote:Met 3 Spurs fans last night and all 3 deep down believed Eriksen is better than Ozil.... I couldn't help but laugh.
Quality.
by Zedie » Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:38 pm
AFC10 wrote:Met 3 Spurs fans last night and all 3 deep down believed Eriksen is better than Ozil.... I couldn't help but laugh.
by Callum » Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:13 pm
Sims wrote:They got a bargain with Eriksen, We paid the correct amount for Özil. (Could consider Mesut a bargain with the inflated market).
by Diaby24AFC » Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:16 pm
by Sims » Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:11 am
Callum wrote:Sims wrote:They got a bargain with Eriksen, We paid the correct amount for Özil. (Could consider Mesut a bargain with the inflated market).
Ozil is still better though.
Flamini is better value-for-money than Matic but I'd sure as hell prefer the latter in my side.
by Zenith » Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:00 pm
Sims wrote:They got a bargain with Eriksen, We paid the correct amount for Özil. (Could consider Mesut a bargain with the inflated market).
Zenith wrote:gooney wrote:Zenith wrote:You're not gonna find another AM of his age and potential for €10m.
He's the worst Spurs signing imo and not very good. We have rosicky/cazorla and hell even ox and wilshere. We cant sign players for the sake of signing. He would not get into our starting 11
You watch the Eredivisie? He has been through a rough patch, not particularly by playing bad, not at all actually but he hasn't quite lived up to the hype that has been created around him by the media a few years ago. He's a very clever footballer who would be an instant improvement to our squad, it has nothing to do with signing someone for the sake of it. Besides Rosicky doesn't have the stamina level to play over 35 games per season, plus if Cazorla picks up an injury we're pretty much out of decent options at AM. I'd rather sign Eriksen for £7m and spend the extra money on a top class striker than pay £20m for a horribly overrated Grenier for instance or £15m for a player like Cabaye which we quite frankly don't even need. I personally rate Eriksen much higher than Chadli and that comes from watching them regularly.
Zenith wrote:gooney wrote:Zenith wrote:You watch the Eredivisie? He has been through a rough patch, not particularly by playing bad, not at all actually but he hasn't quite lived up to the hype that has been created around him by the media a few years ago. He's a very clever footballer who would be an instant improvement to our squad, it has nothing to do with signing someone for the sake of it. Besides Rosicky doesn't have the stamina level to play over 35 games per season, plus if Cazorla picks up an injury we're pretty much out of decent options at AM. I'd rather sign Eriksen for £7m and spend the extra money on a top class striker than pay £20m for a horribly overrated Grenier for instance or £15m for a player like Cabaye which we quite frankly don't even need. I personally rate Eriksen much higher than Chadli and that comes from watching them regularly.
He is not close to Cazorla and he is not better than rosicky. Eriksen is very good footballer, but you will see his lack of pace/athleticism be exposed in the PL. Look at Holtby and Sigurdson...they suffer the exact same problem
Rosicky was never a great athlete, neither was Fabregas and Eriksen isn't lacking pace by any means.
by Angelito » Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:08 am
billo2007 wrote:Tottenham suck so bad without Bale and Modric.
On top of that Chadli, Paulinho, Soldado and Lamela have to be one of the worst summers business of all time.
Chiriches looks like a beast whenever I see him though. Would be unfair to include that guy.
by Cripps » Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:14 am
by Gunpowder » Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:17 am
by Royal Gooner » Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:18 am
Cripps wrote:We should try getting Eriksen. Swap deal with Wilshere.
by Cripps » Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:20 am
by GSK_AFC » Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:47 am
Cripps wrote:Unfortunately you are right.
Here, he's getting 90k a week for being shit and injured.
Unlikely he'd get that anywhere else
by AFC10 » Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:16 pm
GSK_AFC wrote:Cripps wrote:Unfortunately you are right.
Here, he's getting 90k a week for being shit and injured.
Unlikely he'd get that anywhere else
Why do you think Wilshere is shit?
by Cripps » Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:55 pm
GSK_AFC wrote:Cripps wrote:Unfortunately you are right.
Here, he's getting 90k a week for being shit and injured.
Unlikely he'd get that anywhere else
Why do you think Wilshere is shit?
by Sims » Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:21 pm
by Schlandi » Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:37 pm
Sims wrote:Wilshere possesses the best technique I have ever seen on an Englishman.