friedslice wrote:Arsenal~Fanatic wrote:Bristol_Gunner wrote:I am still unsure if i want him having a much larger stake in the club, but i do feel with the percentage that he has he should be allowed to invest money into the club for transfers.
Giving a red-carpet Welcome to Silent Stan has done zero benefit to our club . i feel we shouldn't be afraid to
offer Usmanov a seat on the board .There is no harm in it . 'Silent Stan hasn't done anything wrong
at-least' is a negative way of arguing . I feel Getting Usmanov on the board at-least will keep the board
on the toes . Right now it is an arrangement where everybody is nice and cosy with body scratching
one another's back .
It's no surprises you saying this, but still, are you on crack?
There shouldn't even be a need to explain why it's a terrible idea, how badly it could go and the fact that there is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED for a sugar daddy. We're not Citeh or Chelsea, we're a big club with a big fan base, massive stadium and most importantly an EXTREMELY STRONG FINANCIAL POSITION.
As i've said before, we don't need anymore money, we just need Wenger and our board to spend what we have - which is plenty enough to win us titles without the need of someone with a more than dodgy history.
If u already have an opinion about me then keep it to yourself , forum is not a place to get personal
Offering a place on the board=Selling/whoring yourself to Usmanov . Thank you for understanding my point .
If u read my post fully i have said very clearly that right now everybody on the board is acting in harmony
to fill up their already deep pockets . Nobody is seriously bothered about winning something . I mean
Its like a symbiotic relationship where every single person on the board is acting like Wenger's yes man .
Its time somebody is up there in the pack who will at-least question the great footballing decisions
our board and manager have been doing in the past 6 years winning nothing .